BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan

Introduction

Ensuring data compatibility (BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan) can be problematic for all healthcare facilities and could impede critical research, such as the research I am doing at the moment. Electronic health records (EHRs) can exchange data with different medical software systems thanks to data interoperability. Staff members from the facility as well as other facilities can access data that has been submitted into a single EHR.

Related Assessment:
BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 1 Information Collection

Information Authorization

We need full and continuous access to patient records via compatible EHR systems and computer networks in order to guarantee that data from numerous sources is consistent with our physician’s office data. We need to adopt data standards that enable system compatibility in order to achieve this. By standardizing data, we can be sure that the data we compare is comparable. The largest problem with data standardization could be ensuring that the data from our various sources are referring to the same illness—in this case, cancer—and are analyzed similarly. We will go into more depth about using an electronic HIE later, but it is necessary to ensure proper data harmonization.

We shall have no trouble transferring the data to the recipients’ electronic health records once standardization is finished. We can create a list of patients who had their cancer stage documented or not if it was recorded at the time of admission or when the disease was discovered and entered into the HER. This is one example that relates to our research. After that, we can identify the root cause of the issue and concentrate more of our efforts there to make sure that newly diagnosed patients’ cancer stages are recorded.

Examining the sources of the data (BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan) we collect to make sure it is consistent with the data gathered internally at our office and the nearby hospital will be another method to guarantee data standardization. In this instance, I will contrast comparable cancer quality measures with three national benchmarks from AHRQ’s National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report on Cancer Quality Measures Compared to Achievable Benchmarks (see Excel file). In order to verify the validity of our data and its relevance to our healthcare organization, it will be compared to the national benchmark data set by the American Heart Association.

Health Information Quality’s Impact on the HIE

According to Atwal P., Hogin E., Mertz K., Mostashari F., Williams C. (2012), p. 527, “an electronic health information exchange (HIE) allows healthcare providers and patients to have secure access to important medical information.” A certain degree of interoperability provided by an HIE can improve patient records’ completeness and significantly raise the standard of care. Inaccurate or incomplete data submitted by facilities to their HIE can lead to issues such as missed readmissions, prescription errors, misdiagnoses, and unnecessary testing. If I run across this kind of issue, my suggestion might not be accurate.

We will use a type of HIE known as “Directed Exchange” to stop this, which enables providers to safely transmit patient data to other medical specialists directly (Casalino, L., Shapiro, J., Unruh, M., & Vest, J. 2019, p. 981). Between reputable healthcare providers, the data is reliably and securely transmitted electronically. It makes coordinating patient care simple and adds further dependability to our clinic.

Conclusion – BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan

In conclusion, using a variety of internal and external databases—from AHRQ-like databases to EHRs—is essential when performing a review of the material. A certain degree of interoperability is needed to gather, transmit, and protect accurate and trustworthy information related to this topic. My office’s first goal is to provide better patient care. I hope that in order to help our patients in the future, this proposal adheres to the best practices for data collection and evaluation.

References

BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan: Atwal P., Hogin E., Mertz K., Mostashari F., Williams C. From the Office of the National Coordinator: the strategy for advancing the exchange of health information. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):527-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1314. Erratum in: Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):886. PMID: 22392663.

BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan: Casalino L., Shapiro J., Unruh M., Vest J., The associations between query-based and directed health information exchange with potentially avoidable use of health care services.

BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Ford Regan: Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct; 54(5): 981-993. PMID: 21112303 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports. NHQDR Web Site – National Cancer Benchmark Details. (n.d.). Retrieved May 8, 2022, from https://nhqrnet.ahrq.gov/inhqrdr/National/benchmark/table/Diseases_and_Conditions/Cancer

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

    Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

      Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
      Scroll to Top
      × How can I help you?