BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry

Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry

A healthcare system (BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry) can only function with physicians, nurses, and other medical experts, it is a truth. It is also clear that competent and trustworthy leadership exercised at appropriate times and places is necessary for the effective delivery of healthcare. Effective leadership can have a significant positive impact on both healthcare organizations and individual patients (Geerts et al., 2020). Leadership in the dynamic healthcare sector requires foresight, adaptability, collaboration, moral judgment, and an individual-centered approach. In the end, proactive leaders who can handle complexity, promote change, and encourage innovation will be the ones who improve healthcare.

Related Assessment:
BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 1 Vila Health: Patient Flow

Influence of Leadership on the Patient Experience 

There has been a recent movement in favor of acknowledging patient pleasure (BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry) as a distinct element of high-quality healthcare. The phrase “patient experience” refers to an individual’s overall perception of their care at any stage of the treatment plan, whether or not they interact directly with their medical professional. According to Wensley et al. (2020), a patient’s satisfaction with their care is significantly influenced by the duration of their hospital stay. When patients feel comfortable communicating with their physician about the caliber of care they receive, their happiness with their healthcare improves (Cheng et al., 2023). 

Patient satisfaction raises the possibility that patients will follow treatment plans, take medications as directed, and engage in preventative care, all of which lead to better health outcomes. People are more likely to participate actively in their healthcare when they believe they are receiving what they need. When a patient feels valued, heard, and included, they are more likely to take an active role in their care and to ask questions of their doctors. If this is done, patient compliance with treatment plans may increase and medical outcomes may improve. Furthermore, satisfied patients are more likely to visit the same doctor again.

Patients who are happy with their care are more inclined to tell their loved ones about the medical professional. More people, more cash, and greater power over the healthcare provider market (BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry) could result from this. Patients are less inclined to wait, postpone, or fail to show up when their encounters are efficient and interesting. Revenue loss, labor productivity, and resource usage are all three optimized. Furthermore, prompt payments from contented clients guarantee the income of healthcare professionals and lessen the administrative burden. monetary prospects.

Setting the company’s vision and creating a culture where patients are the focal point of everything that they do are the responsibilities of senior management. They offer guidelines and therapy suggestions depending on the particular needs of every patient. By consistently highlighting the value of the patient’s perspective, leaders establish a pervasive culture that directs the behavior of every employee. Having dedicated leadership is essential for success in all other areas, including encouraging innovation and motivating employees to provide patient-centered care (Mutonyi et al., 2023). Good communication can improve the quality of the patient experience. It is the duty of upper management to facilitate patient communication and to pay attention to their opinions and recommendations.

Patients can participate in advisory committees, town hall meetings, and surveys to have a say in how their organization is run. Ultimately, it is impossible to overestimate the significance of senior leadership in terms of assigning funds and offering support in order to improve the patient experience (BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry). Prioritizing funding for infrastructure, education, and technology in order to facilitate patient-centered treatment is crucial. This include advocating for initiatives that put patients’ needs first, making sure there is adequate staffing, and putting policies in place to shorten wait times.

Consequences of Not Making the Patient Experience a Priority

The patient may become less motivated to participate in their own care and recovery (BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry) if their viewpoint is ignored. A patient’s health outcomes may deteriorate if they are less likely to follow their treatment plan, take their medication as prescribed, or engage in preventative care. If the patient’s experience is not given priority, the business can suffer financial losses. A bad patient experience could lead to fewer appointments, less money, and possibly legal problems. Sometimes, unhappy patients vent their views in public places like review websites. Patients who are unhappy with their doctors frequently use PRWs to air their grievances (Zaitzow et al., 2021).

Only by speaking with actual patients can the sustainability, worth, and caliber of healthcare delivery systems be evaluated globally. If test results or appointments are delayed, patients may get angry and think they are not receiving timely care. Longer wait times have been shown to have a negative impact on both patient treatment and patients’ willingness to seek medical help. The patient’s health will suffer as a result of the disruption to the routine caregiving. A decrease in patient satisfaction would lead to a fall in patient engagement and dedication to treatment plans. Unfavorable patient experiences may negatively impact medication use or adherence to treatment.

Low patient satisfaction ratings can also affect an organization’s financial performance by lowering patient volume and revenue, which may result in penalties or lower reimbursements. Not to mention, it’s less probable for customers to share unfavorable reviews with others. This can make it more difficult for the company to attract new customers.

Management of Service Lines – BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry

Service lines are distinct divisions or programs within the healthcare system that concentrate on offering a single service modality. Within healthcare organizations, service lines are hierarchical arrangements that group physicians, nurses, and other support personnel who share a common area of expertise. Their purpose is to offer patients with unique healthcare requirements all-encompassing and well-coordinated care. Hospitals and physicians can arrange and provide services in accordance with certain diseases, organ systems, and demographics by using service lines, which are specialized marketing tactics. In order to provide their patients with greater care, healthcare institutions frequently create service lines that bring together multidisciplinary teams that are experts in a particular field of medicine.

Better patient results and coordination are made possible by this, enhancing the patients’ experiences. The effective allocation of resources within a healthcare institution is contingent upon the presence of service lines. Companies can more quickly detect problem areas and adapt to changing market conditions with the use of this resource allocation strategy (Jelonek et al., 2022). Theoretically, both clinically and practically, monitoring a patient group should be less expensive with service-line management. Modern facilities, skilled medical personnel, and well-established service lines all contribute to a business’s clinical excellence. The company’s flourishing reputation and growth are attributed to patient happiness, physician endorsements, and word-of-mouth.

In healthcare organizations, the partitions that once divided clinical divisions have been partially dismantled by service lines. Every clinical section functioned autonomously, focusing primarily on their corresponding medical subspecialty. The clinical departments were given a great deal of management and administrative authority. Budgets, hiring decisions, and long-term goals were the purview of distinct departments. As a result, it is typical for several departments within a single business to have unique rules, procedures, and standards. Clinical units were granted a great deal of autonomy over daily operations and decision-making. Every department was responsible for managing its own personnel, assets, budget, and long-term plan.

Consequently, it is not unusual for various departments within the same corporation to have unique standards, practices, and policies. One approach to improving the quality of treatment is to have a business executive and a medical specialist collaborate as managers (Jelonek et al., 2022). Before a dyad management paradigm is implemented, a significant cultural shift must occur within the organization. A type of collaborative leadership known as “dyad management” involves two people sharing decision-making authority over a common task or topic.

This strategy usually pairs an executive leader with a clinical leader to make choices and advance the organization. Organizational leaders and frontline career skills are combined in the dyad paradigm. Decisions are more thorough and objective when operational and clinical aspects are included.

However, if the roles and responsibilities of clinical and administrative leaders are not clearly defined, miscommunications and conflicts may result. Conflict can arise in a dyadic relationship due to unpredictable decisions, obligations, and authority allocations. In a dyad management organization, cooperative leadership takes the place of the more typical hierarchical structure. This new paradigm places a strong emphasis on the benefits of cooperation, tolerance, and consensus.

It is imperative for leaders to embrace a novel mindset that recognizes the value of diverse perspectives and actively pursues avenues for candid dialogue and cooperative issue resolution. The use of dyad management helps to dissolve divisions between the administrative and therapeutic aspects of a company. The organization’s culture must change if the administrative and clinical staff are to get over their mistrust of one another and learn how to collaborate well.

The Value of Provider and Employee Relations

In a healthcare company, support services are essential to the success of a service line. For the smooth operation and provision of services, these roles’ resources, integration, and support are crucial. The service line’s cash flow and spending plan are managed by the financial team. This includes managing finances, keeping track of earnings and outlays, creating budgets, and guaranteeing financial stability. The performance and resource allocation of the service line determine how well it will accomplish its objectives.

The service line benefits from HR’s staffing, hiring, orientation, training, assessment, and employee interaction duties. The main duty of human resources is to make sure that the service line has competent and motivated workers. HR is also in charge of managing staffing needs and promoting a happy and productive work environment.

The service line’s profitability depends heavily on the HR policies’ capacity to raise worker satisfaction, loyalty, and productivity. Officers in charge of quality and compliance make sure that their good or service conforms with all applicable rules, regulations, and laws. Clinical outcomes, patient safety, infection rates, and certification procedures are all monitored. Quality control and compliance procedures have an impact on client satisfaction, risk reduction, and a constant high standard of care.

A competent and driven staff is essential to the service line director’s capacity to accomplish objectives and provide services. This group includes administrators, support staff, allied health professionals, doctors, and nurses. One significant cultural resource is the institutional culture of a healthcare provider. It encompasses the beliefs, traditions, and behaviors of those who collaborate. To be successful, the service line director needs to work in an environment that is supportive and constructive. Because of the way staff members interact with each other and the patients, it affects the treatment that patients receive.

The Health Care Leader’s Role

Ensuring that a company’s processes, goods, and services consistently meet or beyond customer expectations is the main goal of quality management. It is essential to every business’s success. Healthcare has traditionally placed a strong emphasis on quality principles (Saragih et al., 2020). Using good quality management practices can enhance patient outcomes as well as satisfaction. Organizations can raise the standard of care they provide by implementing evidence-based procedures, closely monitoring clinical workflows, and placing a high priority on patient safety. The advantages include better health, a decline in medical errors, higher service quality, and happier patients. Giving patients outstanding care can improve a business’s reputation, client retention rates, and financial results.

Companies who can demonstrate their dedication to providing excellent customer service will prosper. Patients and insurance companies prioritize efficacy metrics such as patient satisfaction surveys and survival rates when selecting a healthcare provider.

Establishing the mission, vision, and values of their organizations is the responsibility of leaders. They convey to the rest of the organization the importance of quality as a strategic goal. Establishing a culture of quality that aligns with the organization’s overarching objectives is how leaders pave the way for quality improvement. Leaders provide resources like funds and labor to promote high-quality initiatives. They ensure that every requirement for first-rate care is met, including personnel training and infrastructure. Leaders that invest in quality management systems show that they have the resources and are dedicated to raising quality.

Clinical results, medical errors, and patient safety can all be adversely impacted by inadequate quality management. Patients suffer, the business’s reputation suffers, and there could be financial and legal fallout. Poor quality can lead to negative press, which can harm an organization’s reputation and patients’ trust. Negative internet reviews, poor patient satisfaction, and bad word of mouth all hurt the company’s reputation.

Capacity to draw in and hold onto clients. Costs may go up as a result of inefficient procedures, poor quality work, or disregard for relevant laws and guidelines. If companies are discovered to be in violation of these standards, they may be subject to fines, decreased reimbursements, or possibly the termination of payer contracts. Cleanup, litigation settlements, and damage control can add up to a big price.

Regular visits allow supervisors to establish rapport (BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry), guarantee continuous care, get quick feedback, resume operations in an emergency, and thank staff members and offer them future chances (Littleton et al., 2019). When supervisors, managers, and executives visit employees, patients, and other stakeholders on a frequent basis, it’s known as management rounding.

This makes it easier for leaders to communicate with frontline staff, patients, and families, which enables the prompt detection of quality-related problems. Observing workflows, having conversations, and paying close attention can help leaders identify any problems with patient care, safety, and service delivery. Furthermore, management can take quick action to address any quality problems that are discovered. Leaders that are personable and visible can better encourage quick problem-solving and start the required steps to address challenges.

References – BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Cheng, A. W., Nakash, O., Cruz-Gonzalez, M., Fillbrunn, M. K., & Alegría, M. (2023). The association between patient-provider racial/ethnic concordance, working alliance, and length of treatment in behavioral health settings.Psychological services20(S1), 145. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-81532-001

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Geerts, J. M., Goodall, A. H., & Agius, S. (2020). Evidence-based leadership development for physicians: a systematic literature review.Social Science & Medicine 246, 112709. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361930704X

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Jelonek, D., Tien, N. H., Dao, M. T. H., & Minh, D. T. (2022). Comparative analysis of the business strategy of Vietnamese real estate developers: the use of Hoffer matrix. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation,3(1), 197-204. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hoang-Tien-Nguyen-2/publication/358022086_Comparative_analysis_of_business_strategy_of_Vietnamese_real_estate_developers_The_use_of_Hoffer_matrix/links/634be9da9cb4fe44f32c843e/Comparative-analysis-of-business-strategy-of-Vietnamese-real-estate-developers-The-use-of-Hoffer-matrix.pdf

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Mutonyi, B. R., González-Piñero, M., Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2023). Driving Innovation in Healthcare: Exploring the Impact of Ambidextrous Leadership on Creative Performance among Frontline Health Professionals in Norway. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3039926/latest

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Saragih, J., Tarigan, A., Pratama, I., Wardati, J., & Silalahi, E. F. (2020). The impact of total quality management, supply chain management practices, and operations capability on firm performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies,21(2), 384-397. https://pjms.zim.pcz.pl/article/01.3001.0014.3012/en

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Wensley, C., Botti, M., McKillop, A., & Merry, A. F. (2020). Maximizing comfort: How do patients describe the care that matters? A two-stage qualitative descriptive study to develop a quality improvement framework for comfort-related care in inpatient settings. BMJ open,10(5), e033336. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/5/e033336.abstract

BHA FPX 4110 Assessment 3 Leadership in the Dynamic Healthcare Industry: Zaitzow, B. H., & Willis, A. K. (2021). Behind the wall of indifference: Prisoner voices about the realities of prison health care.Laws,10(1), 11. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/1/11

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

    Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

      Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
      Scroll to Top
      × How can I help you?