NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles Healthcare professionals regularly face ethical dilemmas in their practice. To comprehend these complicated situations, fundamental concepts drive their behavior. NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles, helps professionals cope with these dilemmas. These principles include autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, which serve as a moral compass for patient care. Autonomy requires honoring the right of patients to make healthcare decisions for themselves, whereas nonmaleficence emphasizes the obligation not to cause harm. Beneficence entails the intention to behave in the patient’s best interests, aiming to improve their well-being. Everyone must be treated fairly and cared for for justice to exist. These principles serve as guidance for healthcare practitioners to preserve ethical norms and make good moral judgments in their work, ensuring that their patients’ welfare and dignity come first.

Overview of the Case Study – NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

In this case study, Nurse Amelia Brooks is presented with a difficult ethical dilemma that sets her personal convictions against her professional responsibilities. On the one hand, she has strong religious beliefs about participation in abortion procedures (Capella University, 2024). On the other hand, she recognizes her responsibility as a healthcare professional to provide care without presumptions and to emphasize her patients’ well-being and autonomy. The concept of autonomy is critical in this circumstance because it applies to both Sophie’s right to choose her own treatment and Amelia’s right to act in line with her values. Sophie’s autonomy includes the right to choose whether or not to have an elective abortion. Similarly, Amelia’s autonomy includes the right to uphold her deeply held ethical convictions.

Amelia’s professional responsibilities require her to offer treatment to all patients, regardless of her personal convictions. This concept emphasizes the necessity of maintaining professional standards and ensuring fair access to healthcare services. However, this obligation must be tempered with the concept of nonmaleficence, which states that healthcare providers should not cause harm. To overcome this dilemma, Amelia must carefully analyze the potential consequences of her decisions. She must measure the potential harm to Sophie from refusing to participate in the surgery against the potential suffering she could face from acting against her conscience (Capella University, 2024). This necessitates a fine balance between respecting Sophie’s individuality and upholding her personal convictions while carrying out her professional responsibilities.

Lastly, Amelia could require advice from her coworkers, superiors, or ethical committees within the healthcare organization to identify the best course of action. Open discussion and collaboration with the patient, Dr. Martin, and other members of the healthcare team can assist in identifying a solution that follows ethical principles while respecting everyone involved. Furthermore, the medical facility could be required to establish rules to handle conscientious concerns among healthcare personnel while ensuring that patient care is not compromised.

Using the Ethical Decision-making Model to Analyse the Ethical Issue

In the case of Nurse Amelia Brooks’ patient Sophie Turner’s elective abortion surgery, the ethical decision-making model serves as a powerful framework for explaining the situation. When Nurse Brooks gets called to the operation for the first time, her moral sensitivity awakens as she struggles to balance her personal beliefs with her professional responsibilities. This ethical consciousness drives her to confront important ethical principles such as autonomy, professional responsibility, and nonmaleficence. Furthermore, Amelia must strike a balance between Sophie’s right to choose and her commitment to provide nonjudgmental care and protect Sophie from harm. Later in the moral judgment phase, she is at a crossroads and must reconcile these principles while also considering the potential dangers and implications of her decision for Sophie and herself. She must decide whether to emphasize Sophie’s individualism or her own ethical principles. Finally, nurse Brooks needs to act based on her ethical code. It can manifest as a more gracious refusal to get involved while ensuring Sophie receives the appropriate treatment through alternate sources. After reading NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles you know how to deal with it.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Analysis

Christina Lamb and  Barbara Pesut’s relevant peer-reviewed journal article “Conscience and conscientious objection in nursing: A personalist bioethics approach” published in the journal Sage Nursing Ethics in 2021 investigates the ethical complexities of conscientious objection in healthcare, particularly in controversial procedures such as abortion. The authors contend that, while healthcare practitioners can conscientiously object based on personal convictions, they also must provide patients with access to lawful and medically necessary care while respecting patient autonomy (Lamb & Pesut, 2021). Applying the concepts of this essay to Nurse Amelia Brooks’ problem stresses the importance of striking a compromise between her conscientious objection and her professional obligation to give treatment without prejudice, all while respecting Sophie Turner’s autonomy. The article’s credibility is further proven by its publication in a highly regarded journal, and its significance is clear in resolving Nurse Brooks’ ethical dilemma. Overall, it offers useful insights for overcoming the ethical dilemma presented in the case study. You can also take nursing class online.

Effective Communication in Resolving Ethical Conflicts – NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

Effective communication is critical in resolving ethical dilemmas, as evidenced in the case study of Nurse Amelia Brooks, who faces an ethical dilemma over participating in an abortion operation. Nurse Brooks talked with Dr. Rebecca Martin and her patient, Sophie Turner. Effective communication with Dr. Martin would entail polite debate and collaboration to develop alternate answers. Similarly, effective communication with Sophie would require empathy, respect for autonomy, and a clear explanation of Nurse Brooks’ restrictions. Effective communication results in collaborative resolutions that respect all parties’ viewpoints and increase patient satisfaction (Bowman et al., 2021). Ineffective communication can lead to strained relationships, ethical problems, and impaired patient care. Healthcare providers should prioritize active listening, empathy, honesty, and clarity in their interactions while avoiding arrogance and lack of empathy (Guppy et al., 2023).

Managing Ethical Issues in Healthcare

In the case study of Nurse Amelia Brooks and her ethical dilemma over participating in an abortion surgery, she displayed a successful strategy for resolving the ethical issue. She recognized the tension between her personal values and professional obligations, demonstrating high moral awareness. Nurse Brooks communicated openly with Dr. Rebecca Martin and patient Sophie Turner, expressing her conscientious objection and exploring alternate options while respecting patient autonomy. Nurse Brooks displayed a commitment to ethical decision-making by balancing her responsibilities to provide treatment without bias and personal integrity. This example emphasizes the necessity of recognizing and addressing ethical quandaries in healthcare practice, stressing good communication, teamwork, and ethical reasoning to promote ethical practice and sustain trust within the healthcare team.

Applying Ethical Principles to Resolve an Ethical Dilemma

In the situation of Nurse Amelia Brooks, who faces a moral dilemma about participating in an abortion surgery, using ethical principles can help lead to a viable solution. One potential approach is for Nurse Brooks to respectfully voice her conscientious objection to Dr. Rebecca Martin and work together to locate an alternate healthcare practitioner to help with the surgery. NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles follows the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. Dr. Martin exhibits a dedication to patient-centered care by respecting Nurse Brooks’ autonomy and moral integrity, as well as promoting a respectful atmosphere within the healthcare team. This strategy promotes professional collaboration by fostering open communication and respect across disciplines. While it can’t completely answer the ethical dilemma, since another physician could be required, it encourages a collaborative and patient-centered approach that prioritizes ethical principles and promotes organizational connections.

Conclusion – NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles

The case study of Nurse Amelia Brooks emphasizes the significance of adopting ethical principles and effective communication tactics for resolving ethical challenges in healthcare practice. Nurse Brooks exhibited a great commitment to ethical decision-making by reconciling her personal convictions with professional obligations and participating in open communication with colleagues and patients. Nurse Brooks used ethical principles like as autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence to develop a solution that honored all parties involved while emphasizing patient-centered care. This example demonstrates the importance of ethical knowledge, communication skills, and collaborative problem-solving in addressing complicated ethical dilemmas inside healthcare organizations.

References

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles: Lamb, C., & Pesut, B. (2021). Conscience and conscientious objection in nursing: A personalist bioethics approach. Nursing Ethics, 28(7-8), 096973302199603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733021996037

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles: Bowman, K. S., Suarez, V. D., & Weiss, M. J. (2021). Standards for Interprofessional Collaboration in the Treatment of Individuals With Autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00560-0

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 3 Applying Ethical Principles: Guppy, J. H., Widlund, H., Munro, R., & Price, J. (2023). Incivility in healthcare: the impact of poor communication. BioMed Journal Leader, content/8/1/83.abstract(8/1/83.abstract), leader. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2022-000717

More Samples:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

    Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

    Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please Enter Active Contact Information For OTP

      Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
      Scroll to Top
      × How can I help you?